Play Fantasy Use your Fantasy skills to win Cash Prizes. Join or start a league today. Play Now
Blog Entry

Big Ten Winners and Losers: Week 12

Posted on: November 20, 2011 4:19 am
 



Posted by Adam Jacobi

A handy recap of who really won and who really lost that you won't find in the box score.

WINNER: Michigan in the trenches

In the biggest "statement game" of Michigan's season, the Wolverines welcomed Nebraska to the Big House with a 45-17 butt-kicking. The game had been tied 10-10 midway through the second quarter, then Denard Robinson and Fitz Toussaint -- seen above -- simply took over the game (with Nebraska's complicity; more on that in a second), especially on the ground.

Before the Nebraska field goal by kicker Brett Maher tied the game at 10, Michigan had thrown the ball on nine of 25 plays. Afterwards? 10 throws on 55 plays. The difference was that offensive coordinator Al Borges was able to put his trust in the offensive line to give Toussaint rushing lanes and Robinson the time to scramble and improvise. The result was 186 rushing yards after that 10-10 tie, and 238 as a whole. 

LOSER: Nebraska's special teams

Of course, we would be remiss in not pointing out that the reason that Michigan stayed so run-heavy in the second half was because Nebraska's defense just plain couldn't get off the field -- and the Husker special teams had a lot to do with that. Kenny Bell and Tim Marlowe each fumbled second-half kickoffs, and Nebraska also allowed a fake field goal to be converted on 4th and 1 at the 5-yard line and committed a costly roughing the punter penalty in the 4th quarter. All in all, the four miscues would eventually lead to 21 points for the Wolverines, and the worst part for Nebraska is that it could have been worse; Marlowe's fumbled return only led to a missed field goal.

All in all, that's a level of generosity that cost Nebraska the opportunity to even make a game of it against Michigan, and while those miscues are more an aberration than a trend that needs to be remedied, they still led to a costly third loss for Nebraska -- one that could very welll keep the Huskers out of the top tier of the Big Ten's non-BCS bowls.

WINNER: Michigan State

Coming into this week, Michigan State needed a win over Indiana and a Michigan win over Nebraska to sew up the Legends division. Michigan, of course, played its part. And good heavens, did Michigan State ever put an exclamation point on its division title, slamming Indiana 55-3 in a contest that probably violated an international statute of warfare or 12. Geneva is unamused by this use of Keshawn Martin on helpless Hoosiers, Sparty.

So while it's a little misleading to say MSU is playing its best football of the season just three weeks after being drubbed 24-3 by Nebraska (and two weeks after beating Minnesota by only a touchdown), it is safe to say the Spartans are looking capable of bringing a dangerous team to Indianapolis in December. The Capital One Bowl brass is probably the happiest of anyone to see this bumplet of success from East Lansing as the Spartans prepare for the championship; MSU lost 49-7 to Alabama in that bowl just last season, and bowl reps usually don't need much of a reason not to bring a team back for a second year in a row. 

LOSER: Ohio State's momentum

QB Braxton Miller is improving week to week, RB Boom Herron is healthy and putting up big numbers in the terrifying Buckeye ground game, and now WR DeVier Posey's back and making big plays from the word go. So why's Ohio State on a two-game losing streak and in real danger of going .500 on the year?

It's a legitimate question, and one that a simple answer of "because Luke Fickell isn't good enough" doesn't adequately answer. Perhaps some of it is Fickell's inexperience as head coach, but he also had to deal with a slew of suspensions and the loss of a quarterback -- a loss that Ohio State just plain wasn't prepared to address this season. Braxton Miller may be showing flashes of greatness now, but in September, he could barely outplay Joe Bauserman. Things were not good.

Still, losses to Purdue and a reeling Penn State team are probably enough to convince Ohio State brass that no matter how unlikely the problems of 2011 are to repeat in 2012, the program needs a more experienced coach at the helm. And that's probably the correct call. But you've got to think that if Fickell gets replaced, he'll look back at these last two weeks and think about how close he was to delivering a solid season -- and earning the head coaching job long term.

WINNER: The rest of Penn State's season

No, Penn State didn't gain any ground in the Leaders Division race; that situation continues to come down to next week's Penn State-Wisconsin game, and it wouldn't have mattered if the Nittany Lions came into that one with a one-game lead or a tie. But strictly from the perspective of returning to normal, Penn State gained a huge victory by hanging on to win at Ohio State. PSU never threatened to score after being stuffed on a goal line stand midway through the third quarter, and all the Buckeyes needed to do in the second half was score seven points to take the lead. That, clearly, didn't happen; Linebacker U stood tall on defense and kept the Buckeyes from taking a single snap in field goal range after halftime, and the second half shutout preserved a 20-14 victory.

In terms of what the win represents to Penn State, division ramifications aside, it's huge. Even leaving out the emotional impact of the football program on the fanbase -- that's a can of worms best kept shut -- there's basically no way Penn State could have taken two straight losses to lower-ranked opponents, then walked into Camp Randall (where the Badgers have outscored their opponents by an average score of 52-12 this year) and come away with a win -- especially not with an interim head coach on the sidelines, forced to argue against all evidence that the world is not caving in on the program in a tailspin. But with this win, that tailspin's not happening, and Penn State can take a deep breath and begin preparation for the Badgers.

LOSER: Wisconsin's what could have been

In case you hadn't noticed, the Top 10 was basically incinerated this week, starting with Iowa State's shocking upset of No. 2 Oklahoma State on Friday and continuing on through Baylor's 45-38 stunner vs. Oklahoma late Saturday night. No, Wisconsin doesn't have anything to do with those games, but therein lies the problem. Just one month ago, Wisconsin was 6-0, ranked fourth in the nation, and rolling through its competition. Then two Hail Mary losses demolished Wisconsin's national standing, and the Badgers are still ranked 17th and unlikely to move much higher after a lackluster 28-17 win over Illinois.

It's a shame, because Wisconsin's got the talent to hang with just about anybody in the nation, and this sudden swarm of chaos in the Top 10 would have been the perfect way for the Badgers to start sneaking up toward the Top 5 even with one loss; they'd quite assuredly be ranked second if undefeated. But alas, Kirk Cousins and Braxton Miller had other ideas for the fate of Wisconsin's season, and as a result a team that looked like a very strong BCS contender will likely walk into the Rose Bowl as a borderline Top 10 team instead.

WINNER: Marvin McNutt

It's getting difficult to find a way in which Marvin McNutt isn't the best receiver Iowa's ever had. McNutt owns career marks in yards, touchdowns, and receptions at Iowa, and he just added the single-season touchdown mark to his single-season yardage mark today in a nine-catch, 151-yard, two-touchdown effort. McNutt made multiple highlight-reel catches in the game, including this juggling wonder that basically sealed Iowa's 31-21 victory over Purdue. It's a crying shame that McNutt, who's putting up these numbers in a non-pass-wacky offense, isn't being considered for the Biletnikoff Award, because he's been nearly unguardable this season.

LOSER: Anyone who felt like paying attention to more than two or three Big Ten games this week

We understand that networks have their reasons for wanting certain games at certain times, and that it's going to be difficult to drum up support for 'Cats-Gophers as anything but an early kickoff. We get that. We also realize that there's a very good reason for the Big Ten to not allow night games in November, since the Midwest is a cold, inhospitable prison of a region once the sun goes down this time of year. But when the Big Ten ends up with five of its six games all taking place at the same time, something's clearly out of whack, and it makes it extremely difficult for the most passionate fans of the conference to enjoy very much of it.

That all said, it's also a credit to the conference that it has a media presence robust enough to get all five of those games televised live (and in HD!), and without having to resort to an online video service (pay-per-view or otherwise) or ESPN GamePlan. Sure, it took two Big Ten Network overflow channels to make it happen, and not everybody has those extra channels, but as other major conferences struggle to get every game on TV even when there aren't many other conference games going on, it's nice to see the Big Ten at least up to this task.

Comments

Since: Sep 30, 2007
Posted on: November 21, 2011 5:40 pm
 

Big Ten Winners and Losers: Week 12

The BCS process is such a joke; I don't think the Badgers would have garnished enough votes to crack the SEC-dominated top three even if they were without a loss. That being said, a possible Oregon-Wisconsin match-up in the Rose Bowl is a fine reward for the Badgers' season that had such promise at the start and was derailed by two instances of poor defensive execution. If Ball and Wilson were playing in the SEC, they would be strong candidates for the Heisman because they would benefit from the media's incessant coverage of what is a top-heavy and overrated collection of scandal-ridden schools. It appears the Big Ten will have two teams in the BCS bowl series and several opportunities to show that the conference this year is much stronger and balanced than every other conference, especially the overrated SEC.



Since: Oct 14, 2011
Posted on: November 21, 2011 4:41 pm
 

So Wisconsin Will Walk into the Rose Bowl?

They are still TWO big wins away from there. They have demonstrated that they can't handle the pressure for multiple big game in a row. Spartans laid and egg against Nebraska, now doubt.  But you are assuming the Spartans played a perfect game and the Badgers blew up as the only way to have lost. Spartans fumbled on the very first snap of the game to give Wilson an easy TD. Wisconsin had a 14 point lead early in that game and were contained by MSU defense. Starting DE stud Gholston did not play for the Spartans. He is a game changer! The Spartans scored 4 TDs on the Wisconsin defense (another was via blocked Punt).  The game was tied when the Hail Mary was thrown, so even if they had missed, the Spartans would have more chances to win.  The way I look at it, we did not play a very good offensive game and won anyway. If our offense is clicking, there is no chance the badgers have a chance.


Mcaylmer
Since: Dec 19, 2006
Posted on: November 20, 2011 2:32 pm
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: May 29, 2009
Posted on: November 20, 2011 7:14 am
 

Big Ten Winners and Losers: Week 12

Wisconsin a loser?
badger,

i think the comment had more to do with what happened to wisconsin when they played MSU and OSU.  with the way things have shook up in the top 10 teams in the country -- wisconsin could be playing next week for a shot at national championship, if not for those two games.

wisconsin has one of the most talented teams in the country and there is zero reason they should have lost to OSU.  after watching what nebraska did the MSU -- i'm not sure how wisconsin lost to them either.  those two letdowns by the badgers cost them a chance at a national title.  if they were beat by better teams -- you just tip your hat to their opponent.  they weren't though.  wisconsin was much more talented than both teams they lost to.

obviously they can still have a great year by beating PSU, but a rose bowl berth in comparison to a national championship game is a little different. 



Since: Nov 25, 2007
Posted on: November 20, 2011 6:23 am
 

Big Ten Winners and Losers: Week 12

Wisconsin a loser? That headline was valid three weeks ago, after the Badgers had been stunned for a second consecutive week by a Hail Mary pass, adding Ohio State to Michigan State as UW's conquerors. Wisconsin's hopes for a national championship or a second consecutive Rose Bowl appearance appeared dashed.
    But in the last two weeks the Badgers' season and postseason prospects immensely improved. A combination of three UW wins, culminating in a difficult come-from-behind road victory over Illinois - emotionally playing for coach Ron Zook's job - and losses by Ohio State and Penn State have put the Badgers back in contention for a chance to reach the Big Ten Championship Game with a win over Penn State next Saturday.
    That would give Wisconsin a shot at a rematch with Michigan State and a genuine shot at the Rose Bowl, which is any Big Ten team's first goal at the start of a season. The national championship game is a bonus in the BCS' restrictive 1 vs. 2 format.
   So considering their emergence from football purgatory the Badgers certainly should be listed as one of the Big Ten ``Winners'' this week.
    


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com